n.18 | September 2026
Behind the scenes of the Nobel Prize in Physics
It is 10 December, and you are in Stockholm City Hall, Sweden. You are dressed for the occasion, some in traditional costume, some in evening wear, all 1,300 of you impeccable. The Blue Hall you are standing in (which, in fact, is not blue) is adorned with more than ten thousand flowers from Sanremo — the city where Alfred Nobel, the brilliant inventor who has brought you all together here tonight, died. Your eyes are fixed on the staircase at the far end of the hall, where the laureates, fresh from receiving their medals, and the Swedish Royal Family are about to make their entrance. They will raise a toast, which will open the banquet. You are curious, at times impatient: the menu has been kept secret until the very last minute. Yet the discretion of the Swedish chefs does not surprise you; you are accustomed to that of the entire Nobel machine. The Swedish and Norwegian institutions entrusted by Alfred Nobel himself, in his will, with awarding the prize are masters of secrecy: the nomination process is confidential, the selection process is confidential, and even the nominations themselves remain secret for at least fifty years. Every year, the Nobel Prize in Physics is awarded by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, and we met Mats Larsson, member of the Nobel Committee for Physics in 2013 and from 2016 to 2023, to hear some behind-the-scenes stories.

Mats Larsson is Professor of Physics at Stockholm University and, from 2011 to 2020, was Director of the AlbaNova University Center in Stockholm, a joint scientific centre of the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) and Stockholm University. He served on the Nobel Committee for Physics in 2013 and from 2016 to 2023. His research interests include laboratory astrophysics and its importance to astrochemistry, free electron laser research targeting small molecules and, more recently, molecular chirality and chiral interactions.
Mats Larsson
Interview with Mats Larsson, member of the Nobel Committee for Physics in 2013 and from 2016 to 2023
You were a member of the Nobel Committee for Physics for nine years and have shared that your favourite moment has always been hearing the laureates’ reaction when they receive the magic phone call. Is it true that you call them only a few minutes before the public announcement? Which of those calls do you remember most vividly?
That is such an interesting experience, and every phone call is special in its own way. We call the laureates a few minutes after the decision has been made, although we do not always manage to reach them. Once we have finished the call, we line up for the press conference, and that is where we make the announcement. We are always happy if at least one of the Nobel laureates attends the press conference, because journalists have a lot of questions. But, as I said, sometimes we cannot speak to the winners, or we only manage to reach them in rather roundabout ways. In 2023, when we called the French-Swedish laureate Anne L’Huillier, we couldn’t talk to her. But it turns out that her husband is also a member of the Academy, so we called him and asked how we could get in touch with Anne. He immediately understood what was going on, and suggested that we wait a few minutes, because Anne was teaching at the time. Ten minutes later we were on the phone with her: she told us how delighted she was to hear that we had awarded her the prize, and then she dismissed us with a “Well, now I have to get back to teaching”.
The Nobel call always comes as a surprise: you cannot nominate yourself and the nominations are kept confidential. How does the nomination process actually work? And who is entitled to submit a nomination?
There is a list of the people that are allowed to send nominations, which includes, first and foremost, all members of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and professors of Physics in the Nordic countries. We then send a request for nominations to various universities, asking for each nomination to be submitted by a single qualified individual (we don’t want, for example, to have a faculty meeting where everyone is invited to vote), and we have also drawn up a long list of competent people who can submit nominations. Last but not least, former Nobel laureates are always invited to nominate someone. And usually, even going back through the archives, nominations submitted by really distinguished people carry a lot of weight. Then the quality of the nominations can vary considerably. There are very careful nominations, in which strong arguments in favour of the candidate are presented precisely, and extremely brief nominations, such as those sometimes submitted by Einstein. Naturally, if you are not a very prominent person, simply giving a name and a few lines doesn’t carry all that much weight, a well-considered motivation makes the difference.
Read the interview Read the interview- October 1-10Social Domus, BergamoINFN at BergamoScienza 2026INFN at BergamoScienza 2026
- October 23, 9.00 pm
- October 24, 6.30 pm
A new chapter in the study of the origin of the heavy elements begins at INFN Legnaro National Laboratories
New measurements of helium-4 challenge nuclear models at INFN National Laboratories of the South
At INFN Frascati National Laboratories, the first quantum oscillations of a “made in Italy” transmon qubit
Art, science and research: the 5th edition of the Art&Science Across Italy Master gets underway at CERN
Fundamental physics and emerging technologies: Italy and the United States renew their collaboration in Washington
Particle Chronicle © 2025-2026 INFN
EDITORIAL BOARD
Coordinator Martina Galli;
Project and contents Martina Bologna, Eleonora Cossi, Martina Galli,
Alex Mattiussi, Francesca Mazzotta, Antonella Varaschin;
Design and mailing coordinator Francesca Cuicchio; ICT service SSNN INFN